5056. Robert ROYSE was born 1605 in Martlock Somerset England. He died Dec. 2nd 1676 in New London, Conn. Robert married Mary SIMS on 4 Jun 1634 in Martlock Somerset England. [Parents]
5057. Mary SIMS was born 1609 in Long Sutton Somerset England. She died 14 Jul 1697 in New London, Conn. [Parents]
5058. Hugh CALKINS [Immigrant] was born about 1600 in Chepstow, Monmouth, Wales. He died 1690 in Norwich, New London, Connecticut. Hugh married Anne EATON about 1625 in , England. [Parents]
SOURCE: Data for the family of Hugh Calkins and his wife Anne are taken from
a FGRC Archive Record submitted by Earl Pingree Tanner, Magrath, Alberta,
Canada, which lists:
- Hyde Genealogy p. 957;
- Savage Calkins Gen. p. 1.SOURCE: Amy Cardon Odell, 3433 Tice Creek Drive #1, Walnut Creek, CA 94595,
who lists:
- American Gen. Vol 255, p 588;
- Savage Dictionary, p 349;
- Hyde Genealogy, p 957;
- Calkins Genealogy, p. 1.NOTE: The Ancestral File gives Hugh's birthplace as Cheapside, Monmouth,
England.NOTE: Surname may have been spelled CAULKIN.
5059. Anne EATON was born about 1605 in Chepstow, Monmouth, Wales. She died about 1711 in Norwich, New London, Connecticut. [Parents]
SOURCE: Anne's surname, birthplace, date and place of death are from the
Ancestral File.NOTE: Dates of birth and death need to be verified, as they show Anne age 106
at death.
5504. Baltasar MOMMA married Elisabeth MONDSCHEIN on 1611. [Parents]
GIVN Baltasar
SURN Momma
PEDI birth
5505. Elisabeth MONDSCHEIN was born about 1590 in Dollartshammer, Rheinland, Prussia.
GIVN Elisabeth
SURN Mondschein
5506. Wilhelm RINCKENS was born 1598 in Stolberg, Rheinland, Prussia. He married Sibylla VELDER on <1623> in
If you have any additional information about these individuals, please contact me. Thanks and good luck in your search
5507. Sibylla VELDER was born 1602 in Stolberg, Rheinland, Prussia.
If you have any additional information about these individuals, please contact me. Thanks and good luck in your search
5952. James HEALD was born about Feb 1565 in Milne Household, Mobberley, Cheshire, England. He died Feb 1627 in ??, Mobberley, Cheshire, England. James married Elizabeth HILL on Feb 1598 in ??, Mobberley, Cheshire, England. [Parents]
Came from "Householder Of "The Milne" , Mobberley Parish, Cheshire, England
William Heald lived at Healdmill Farm in 1609. Healdmill Farm has sites of mill and mill pond and a Quaker burial ground.
Please contact Robert W Heald, healdfamily@netservice.com for more information.
5953. Elizabeth HILL was born 1572 in Bowden Parish, Alderley, Cheshire, England. She died Dec 1640 in ??, Mobberley, Cheshire, England.
Please contact Robert W Heald, healdfamily@netservice.com for more information.
5954. George ROYLE was born about 1590 in ??, Ecclesfield, Lancashire, England.
Please contact Robert W Heald, healdfamily@netservice.com for more information.
5960. Unknown HODGE was born about 1617 in England. He married Mrs. HODGE. [Parents]
5961. Mrs. HODGE was born about 1621 in England.
5962. Henry DENSLOW was born 1618 in Of Pine Meadow, Litchfield, Conn.. He died 25 Mar 1676 in Pine Meadow, Litchfield, Conn. and was buried 1, 2 1696 in Windsor, Hartford, Ct. Henry married 3, 4 Mrs Susannah DENSLOW on 1645 in Windsor Locks, Hartford, Connecticut. [Parents]
5963. Mrs Susannah DENSLOW was born 1624 in Of Pine Meadow, Litchfield, Conn.. She died 26 Aug 1683 in Windsor Locks, Hartford, Conn. and was buried 1, 2 1683 in Windsor, Hartford, Ct.
5964. William BUNNELL was born 1610 in Cheshire, England. He died 18 Aug 1669 in England. William married 1 Ann WILMOT on 1628 in Wallingford, N, Ct. [Parents]
IMM:
[FamilyTree.ged]
http://www.groversmith.com/bonnell.html
"WILLIAM BUNNELL was certainly born in England, although no evidence showing the date or place of his birth has been found. From circumstantial evidence, I have concluded that he was born "about l600." See Newsletter Vol I, No. 1, page 3 (N-I-l-3) for a discussion of the evidence. The second issue of the Newsletter, beginning on page 2, contains every reference to William Bunnell, made during his lifetime, which has come to light so far. From them we glean the following brief account of his life.
He appears first in the Massachusetts Bay Colony, where he was selected on 28 September 1630 to be a juror in an inquiry concerning the death of one Austen Bratcher. Therefore, we can suppose that he was one of the settlers who arrived in New England in the great Winthrop fleet of 1630. (Charles Edward Banks, in his book THE WINTHROP FLEET OF 1630, identified this juror with the William Burnell who died at Boston in 1660/1. However, the name is clearly Bunnell in the record, and there seems to be no reason to assume it was spelled wrong.) "
The first three children of William and Ann Bunnell must have been born at Massachusetts Bay. The order of birth given below is the traditional one, followed by Donald Lines Jacobus in FAMILIES OF ANCIENT NEW HAVEN, although no record seems to exist which mentions the age at any time of any of the three.
In 1640 we find the first of the numerous records of the public assistance provided to William Bunnell and his family, when the General Court of the Colony requested the town of Watertown to provide William Bunnell with a lot, which the Colony would pay for if William could not (N-I-2-2). If the lot was actually provided, no record of it has been
found.
In 1645 the General Court appointed a committee with power to dispose of the children of Goodman Bunnell, "if their grandfather will not take care of them" (The grandfather1 Benjamin Wilmot, had moved to New Haven Colony several years before.) On the same day the Court provided that certain goods be delivered to the same committee "to be disposed of to Goodman Bunnell & his use." Six months later, in May 1646, William Bunnell returned to England, and the Court agreed to pay for 30 shillings worth of clothing for him when he arrived there. (N-I-2-2,3)
There is nothing to show why William went back to England or where in England he went, but he seems to have simply abandoned his family. In a court action in New Haven several years later his wife testified that '1he left little or nothing to maintain them, and she asked him what she should do with them; he said they were hers as well as his, and he left them with her." One of the sons, presumably Benjamin, testified that "he remembers his father did say so to his mother." (N-I-2-5). With no alternative, Ann Bunnell took the three children and moved to New Haven to live with her parents. Her father could not support such a large addition to his family, and they decided "to put forth the children." Nicholas Elsy took one of the boys, presumably the elder (Benjamin, in the traditional order), and Samuel Whitehead took Lydia.
By the middle of 1649, or earlier, William Bunnell returned from England and followed his family to New Haven. On 3 April 1650 he makes his first appearance in the New Haven records, when "The Court freed old Goodman Bunill from paying his poll money to the town, because of his poverty, age and weakness." This is the only reference to William's age in any record. I find it difficult to believe that he was less than 50 years old at the time this statement was made (See
N-I-1-3)
On 4 May 1650 Ann Bunnell gave birth to another daughter, Mary, and in August of that year William was fined 5 shillings for failure to report the birth within three months. A few months later he was in trouble again. On 7 January 1650/51 John Tompson sought the help of the Court to make William Bunnell move out of Tompson's house. Tompson said he was willing to give him a year's rent if he would move peaceably out. This probably means that the Bunnells were at least a year behind in their rent payments, which Tompson would forgive if they would simply vacate. The Court ordered William to move, and gave him two or three weeks to do so. A month later John Tompson was back in Court again asking that William Bunnell be put out of his house. This time Stephen Goodyear undertook to guarantee the move if Tompson would let the Bunnells stay for another week. John Tompson expressed himself satisfied with that arrangement, and apparently it was successful, since the issue did not come before the Court again. (N-I-2-4).
In October 1651 it was William's turn to sue, when he asked the Court to revoke the apprentice agreements Ann and her father had made with Nicholas Elsy and Samuel Whitehead. The Court refused to do so. (N-I-2-5)
During the next six or eight months the Town authorities had to "consider of the charge which old Bunill hath been to the Town, and how it mi~ht be lessened." The first step was to give him an allowance of two shillings a week, "provided that he and his family do what they can towards their maintenance." Then they took up the problem of the son who was still at home (presumably Nathaniel). The Townsmen felt that the boy should be put out to apprenticeship, both to reduce the charge to the Town, and for the good of the boy, "who now for want of due nurture grows rude and offensive." William Judson offered the Bunnells a cow if he could take the boy for "such a number of years as might answer it." When William Bunnell refused to accept this arrangement, the Townsmen retaliated by withdrawing the weekly allowance. (N-I-2-6)
On 28 August 1653 another son, Ebenezer, was born to the Bunnells. He seems to have died very soon. The following February it was reported that Ann Bunnell was sick, and the authorities were still concerned about how much public support was proper and how to make sure that the two remaining children (Nathaniel and Mary) were put out "both for the good of the children (who are not educated as they should) & for the easing the Town of charge." (N-I-2-6, 7).
Ann Bunnell died soon after1 and on the first of May 1654 William told the Town he wanted to go to old England where "he hath some friends to take care of him." The Townsmen and Treasurer were authorized to negotiate his passage on a ship bound from Milford to Newfoundland (and presumably from there to old England). Their conclusion was that this "might free the Town from some charge, though they made some present disbursement for his passage and other necessaries for him." (N-I-2-7)
That is William Bunnell's last appearance in the records of New Haven. We can assume that he boarded the ship and returned to England. He left his four children in New Haven. No record exists to show whether the two younger children were "put out"1 or if so to whom. Perhaps their grandparents or their maternal uncles assumed responsibility for them. Benjamin Wilmot, in his will dated 7 August 1669, left 20 shillings to each of his Bunnell grandchildren (N- I-2-7).
William Bunnell probably died in England if he ever arrived there. It is sometimes asserted that he died on the island of Barbados in the West Indies, since a man of that name was buried in the parish of St. Michaels, Barbados, 5 August 1678. This seems very unlikely, since William would have been around 80 years old and would have made at least five crossings of the Atlantic Ocean.
SOURCES:Records of the Governor and Company of Massachusetts Bay, edited by N. B. Shurtleff, 1853, Vols. 1 & 2.
Records of the Colony and Plantation of New Haven from 1638 to 1649, edited by C. J. Hoadley, 1857, vol. I.
New Haven Town Records, 1649-1662, edited by Franklin B. Dexter! Vol. I.
Vital Records of New Haven, Conn., to 1850.
The Winthrop Fleet of 1630, by C. E. Banks, 1930.
The Original Lists of Persons of Quality, etc., edited by J. C. Hotten, 1874.
Families of Ancient New Haven, compiled by D. L. Jacobus.
"Lieutenant William French and His Descendants," in the New England HistorIcal and Genealogical Register, Vol. 44.
One Bassett Family in America, by Buell B. Bassette, 1926.
[Family Tree2.FTW]http://www.groversmith.com/bonnell.html
"WILLIAM BUNNELL was certainly born in England, although no evidence showing the date or place of his birth has been found. From circumstantial evidence, I have concluded that he was born "about l600." See Newsletter Vol I, No. 1, page 3 (N-I-l-3) for a discussion of the evidence. The second issue of the Newsletter, beginning on page 2, contains every reference to William Bunnell, made during his lifetime, which has come to light so far. From them we glean the following brief account of his life.
He appears first in the Massachusetts Bay Colony, where he was selected on 28 September 1630 to be a juror in an inquiry concerning the death of one Austen Bratcher. Therefore, we can suppose that he was one of the settlers who arrived in New England in the great Winthrop fleet of 1630. (Charles Edward Banks, in his book THE WINTHROP FLEET OF 1630, identified this juror with the William Burnell who died at Boston in 1660/1. However, the name is clearly Bunnell in the record, and there seems to be no reason to assume it was spelled wrong.) "
The first three children of William and Ann Bunnell must have been born at Massachusetts Bay. The order of birth given below is the traditional one, followed by Donald Lines Jacobus in FAMILIES OF ANCIENT NEW HAVEN, although no record seems to exist which mentions the age at any time of any of the three.
In 1640 we find the first of the numerous records of the public assistance provided to William Bunnell and his family, when the General Court of the Colony requested the town of Watertown to provide William Bunnell with a lot, which the Colony would pay for if William could not (N-I-2-2). If the lot was actually provided, no record of it has been
found.
In 1645 the General Court appointed a committee with power to dispose of the children of Goodman Bunnell, "if their grandfather will not take care of them" (The grandfather1 Benjamin Wilmot, had moved to New Haven Colony several years before.) On the same day the Court provided that certain goods be delivered to the same committee "to be disposed of to Goodman Bunnell & his use." Six months later, in May 1646, William Bunnell returned to England, and the Court agreed to pay for 30 shillings worth of clothing for him when he arrived there. (N-I-2-2,3)
There is nothing to show why William went back to England or where in England he went, but he seems to have simply abandoned his family. In a court action in New Haven several years later his wife testified that '1he left little or nothing to maintain them, and she asked him what she should do with them; he said they were hers as well as his, and he left them with her." One of the sons, presumably Benjamin, testified that "he remembers his father did say so to his mother." (N-I-2-5). With no alternative, Ann Bunnell took the three children and moved to New Haven to live with her parents. Her father could not support such a large addition to his family, and they decided "to put forth the children." Nicholas Elsy took one of the boys, presumably the elder (Benjamin, in the traditional order), and Samuel Whitehead took Lydia.
By the middle of 1649, or earlier, William Bunnell returned from England and followed his family to New Haven. On 3 April 1650 he makes his first appearance in the New Haven records, when "The Court freed old Goodman Bunill from paying his poll money to the town, because of his poverty, age and weakness." This is the only reference to William's age in any record. I find it difficult to believe that he was less than 50 years old at the time this statement was made (See
N-I-1-3)
On 4 May 1650 Ann Bunnell gave birth to another daughter, Mary, and in August of that year William was fined 5 shillings for failure to report the birth within three months. A few months later he was in trouble again. On 7 January 1650/51 John Tompson sought the help of the Court to make William Bunnell move out of Tompson's house. Tompson said he was willing to give him a year's rent if he would move peaceably out. This probably means that the Bunnells were at least a year behind in their rent payments, which Tompson would forgive if they would simply vacate. The Court ordered William to move, and gave him two or three weeks to do so. A month later John Tompson was back in Court again asking that William Bunnell be put out of his house. This time Stephen Goodyear undertook to guarantee the move if Tompson would let the Bunnells stay for another week. John Tompson expressed himself satisfied with that arrangement, and apparently it was successful, since the issue did not come before the Court again. (N-I-2-4).
In October 1651 it was William's turn to sue, when he asked the Court to revoke the apprentice agreements Ann and her father had made with Nicholas Elsy and Samuel Whitehead. The Court refused to do so. (N-I-2-5)
During the next six or eight months the Town authorities had to "consider of the charge which old Bunill hath been to the Town, and how it mi~ht be lessened." The first step was to give him an allowance of two shillings a week, "provided that he and his family do what they can towards their maintenance." Then they took up the problem of the son who was still at home (presumably Nathaniel). The Townsmen felt that the boy should be put out to apprenticeship, both to reduce the charge to the Town, and for the good of the boy, "who now for want of due nurture grows rude and offensive." William Judson offered the Bunnells a cow if he could take the boy for "such a number of years as might answer it." When William Bunnell refused to accept this arrangement, the Townsmen retaliated by withdrawing the weekly allowance. (N-I-2-6)
On 28 August 1653 another son, Ebenezer, was born to the Bunnells. He seems to have died very soon. The following February it was reported that Ann Bunnell was sick, and the authorities were still concerned about how much public support was proper and how to make sure that the two remaining children (Nathaniel and Mary) were put out "both for the good of the children (who are not educated as they should) & for the easing the Town of charge." (N-I-2-6, 7).
Ann Bunnell died soon after1 and on the first of May 1654 William told the Town he wanted to go to old England where "he hath some friends to take care of him." The Townsmen and Treasurer were authorized to negotiate his passage on a ship bound from Milford to Newfoundland (and presumably from there to old England). Their conclusion was that this "might free the Town from some charge, though they made some present disbursement for his passage and other necessaries for him." (N-I-2-7)
That is William Bunnell's last appearance in the records of New Haven. We can assume that he boarded the ship and returned to England. He left his four children in New Haven. No record exists to show whether the two younger children were "put out"1 or if so to whom. Perhaps their grandparents or their maternal uncles assumed responsibility for them. Benjamin Wilmot, in his will dated 7 August 1669, left 20 shillings to each of his Bunnell grandchildren (N- I-2-7).
William Bunnell probably died in England if he ever arrived there. It is sometimes asserted that he died on the island of Barbados in the West Indies, since a man of that name was buried in the parish of St. Michaels, Barbados, 5 August 1678. This seems very unlikely, since William would have been around 80 years old and would have made at least five crossings of the Atlantic Ocean.
SOURCES:Records of the Governor and Company of Massachusetts Bay, edited by N. B. Shurtleff, 1853, Vols. 1 & 2.
Records of the Colony and Plantation of New Haven from 1638 to 1649, edited by C. J. Hoadley, 1857, vol. I.
New Haven Town Records, 1649-1662, edited by Franklin B. Dexter! Vol. I.
Vital Records of New Haven, Conn., to 1850.
The Winthrop Fleet of 1630, by C. E. Banks, 1930.
The Original Lists of Persons of Quality, etc., edited by J. C. Hotten, 1874.
Families of Ancient New Haven, compiled by D. L. Jacobus.
"Lieutenant William French and His Descendants," in the New England HistorIcal and Genealogical Register, Vol. 44.
One Bassett Family in America, by Buell B. Bassette, 1926.
5965. Ann WILMOT 1 was born 1614/1618 in England. She died May 1654 in New Haven, CT. [Parents]
IMM:
5966. Peter MALLORY was born 1 about 1627 in England. He died 2 30 Aug 1698 in Fairfield, Fairfield Co., Conn.. Peter married 3 Mary PRESTON on 12 Mar 1648 in Fairfield, Fairfield Co., Conn.. [Parents]
He was of New Haven, Conn. Families of New Haven says Peter's was Varient
Mallory; Eva Jeanne Myers on cd 101, says Peter Born about 1604/10, son of
John & Ann Eure. (See Mary Lue Dixon Potthast's info p 4 for land records of
Peter's, where he names children & wife).
5967. Mary PRESTON was born 1 13 Dec 1629 in Chesham, Bucks, England. She died 2 Dec 1690 in Fairfield, Fairfield Co., Conn.. [Parents]
Automated Archives says Mary died in Fairfield, Ct. Marvin's #1122.
5968. Andrew WARDE was born 1597 in England. He died 1659 in Fairfield, New Haven, Connecticut. Andrew married Hester SHERMANN on 1 Feb 1618/1619 in England. [Parents]
5969. Hester SHERMANN was born 1 Apr 1606 in Dedham, Essex, England. She died 28 Feb 1665/1666 in Fairfield, New Haven, Connecticut. [Parents]
5970. John MEIGS was born 1612 in Bradford, Denvonshire, England. He died 4 Jan 1671/1672 in Killingworth, New Haven, Connecticut. John married Thomasine FRY about 1632. [Parents]
5971. Thomasine FRY was born about 1612 in Weymouth, Dorsetshire, England. She died 4 Jan 1671/1672 in Killingworth, New Haven, Connecticut. [Parents]
5972. Thomas BEACH was born 1627 in Devonshire, England. He died 31 May 1662 in Milford, New Haven, Connecticut. Thomas married Sarah PLATT on 25 Sep 1652. [Parents]
There are some who think that Thomas' parents were Thomas Beach (son of Robert Beche, born abt. 1564 at St. Albans, Devonshire, England) born abt. 1590 at St. Albans, Devonshire, England and died 1636 in St. Albans, Devonshire, England. Thomas Sr. married Jaon Hill October 5, 1611 in St. Albans, Devonshire, England. Joan Hill was born about 1593 in St. Albans, Devonshire, England and died 1636 St. Albans, Devonshire, England. However, I was more convinced that Reverent John Beach and Miss Moss were his parents by information from "History & Genealogy of Families of Old Fairfield" by Jacobus, TEK 1982; Stephaen Chinn (Chinn@ctrvax.Vanderbilt.edu, adrress P.O. Box 121473, Nashville, Tennessee 37212-1473, Internet: CHINN@ctrvax.Vanderbilt,edu Bitnet: CHINN@vuctrvax. From email grimmetj@ccmail.orst.edu; charleyvin@aol.com; RJHARRIS@KSUVM.KSU.EDU; rhd@p7.f114.106.z1.fidonet.org;
5973. Sarah PLATT was born 11 Sep 1636 in Ware, Hertfordshire, England. She died 15 May 1670 in Milford, New Haven, Connecticut. [Parents]
5976. Thomas TOWNER 1 was born 1636 in
5977. Mary PAGE 1 was christened 29 Nov 1640 in Paling, Sussex, England. [Parents]
5980. Thomas BARNES was born 26 Aug 1623 in Barking, Essex, Eng. He died 10 Jun 1691 in New Haven, New Haven, CT. Thomas married Mary Elizabeth ANDREWS about 1642 in Hingham, Plymouth, MA. [Parents]
Ancient Families of New Haven, Conn.; Vol. 1; p. 115-116.
Archive Record submitted by Edna Merriam Wishart.
This family is very mixed up in the Ancestral file.
5981. Mary Elizabeth ANDREWS was born 15 Apr 1626 in Eng. She died 25 Jan 1663 in New Haven, New Haven, CT.
First and Last names are questionable. Possibly Ann.
5982. John FROST was born 1642 in Of New Haven, New Haven, CT. He died 4 Apr 1707 in New Haven, New Haven, CT. John married Mercy PAINE on 9 Jun 1664 in New Haven, New Haven, CT. [Parents]
Records of Ancient New Haven, Conn.; Vol.3; p.631.
!Archive Record submitted by Clara M.T. Bartholomew.
5983. Mercy PAINE was born about 1644 in New Haven, New Haven, CT. She died 7 Dec 1693 in New Haven, New Haven, CT. [Parents]
ADULT CHRISTENING: 8 Apr 1688, New Haven, Conn.
5984. George LEWIS was born 3 Aug 1600 in Greenwich, England. He died 3 Mar 1662/1663 in Barnstable, MA. George married Sarah JENKINS on 1626 in England. [Parents]
5985. Sarah JENKINS was born about 1600 in Isle of Edward, England. She died 1654 in Barnstable, Massachusetts. [Parents]